Reviewers

Peer review is the cornerstone of scholarly publishing, ensuring the validity, quality, and originality of articles submitted for publication. It serves as a mechanism of self-regulation within the academic community, maintaining the integrity of research and scholarly communication. At the Research Journal in Translation, Literature, Linguistics, and Education (RJTLLE), we adhere to rigorous peer review standards to uphold the credibility and academic excellence of our publications.

Reviewer Responsibilities

As a peer reviewer for RJTLLE, you play a crucial role in maintaining the quality of published research. Reviewers are selected based on their expertise and are expected to conduct reviews objectively and constructively. Key responsibilities include:

  • Professional Responsibility: Reviewers are encouraged to contribute to the peer review process as part of their professional obligations. This involves providing accurate and verifiable information about their qualifications and expertise.

  • Conflict of Interest: Reviewers must declare any potential conflicts of interest that could bias their assessment of the manuscript. This includes personal, financial, intellectual, professional, political, or religious interests.

  • Timeliness: Reviewers are expected to respond promptly to review invitations and submit their reviews within the agreed timeframe. If unable to meet the deadline, reviewers should notify the journal promptly.

  • Confidentiality: Reviewers must maintain confidentiality regarding the content of manuscripts and refrain from using privileged information for personal advantage.

Conducting a Review

When conducting a review for RJTLLE, reviewers should:

  • Thorough Evaluation: Carefully read the manuscript and supplementary materials, adhering to reviewer instructions provided by the journal. Contact the journal for clarification if necessary.

  • Confidentiality: Respect the confidentiality of the peer review process and avoid disclosing details of the manuscript or review to unauthorized individuals.

  • Objectivity: Conduct the review objectively, without influence from personal biases or external factors. Notify the journal immediately if a conflict of interest arises during the review process.

  • Ethical Concerns: Report any ethical concerns or misconduct encountered during the review process to the journal's editorial team for appropriate action.

Preparing a Review Report

Reviewers should:

  • Format and Content: Follow the journal's guidelines for preparing review reports, including any required format or scoring rubric. Provide constructive feedback to help authors improve their manuscripts.

  • Confidential Comments: Include confidential comments to the editor, highlighting any concerns or recommendations related to the manuscript's suitability for publication.

  • Professionalism: Maintain a professional tone in your comments, refraining from personal attacks or derogatory remarks.

Post-Review Considerations

After completing a review, reviewers should:

  • Follow-Up: Be responsive to follow-up requests from the journal regarding revisions or resubmissions of manuscripts you have reviewed.

  • Confidentiality: Maintain the confidentiality of the peer review process and refrain from disclosing information about the manuscript without permission.

Peer Review Training and Mentoring

We encourage reviewers to participate in peer review training programs to enhance their skills. Mentoring opportunities for early-career researchers interested in peer review are also available upon request.